GMOFORUM.AGROBIOLOGY.EU :  Phorum 5 The fastest message board... ever.
GMO RAUPP.INFO forum provided by WWW.AGROBIOLOGY.EU 
Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
GMO rice found safe, but trade still fettered
Posted by: Prof. Dr. M. Raupp (IP Logged)
Date: November 29, 2006 04:13PM

www.checkbiotech.org ; www.raupp.info ; www.czu.cz

U.S. regulators' latest move to sanction a strain of biotech rice may do
little to soothe lingering doubts about the oversight of genetically
modified foods destined for export markets, analysts and industry groups
said this November 2006 by Missy Ryan.

"This is just a question of reputation," said Steve Suppan, a senior
policy analyst for the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. If
exporters can't guarantee the crops they sell to other countries are
GMO-free, "what is that going to do to the overall ability of U.S. rice
exporters?"

Last week, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced that LLRICE601, a
strain of genetically modified rice made by Bayer CropScience, was safe for
the environment and could be grown and sold without government oversight.

USDA's ruling comes three months after the rice, which was never destined
for supermarkets but somehow made its way into the food chain, was found in
commercial bins in the United States and later in shipments to European
countries.

At least nine countries in Europe -- where consumers are usually more wary
of genetically modified products which some have dubbed "Frankenfoods" --
have discovered LLRICE601 in shipments of long-grain rice from the United
States.

The findings prompted the European Union to slap tighter testing rules on
U.S. rice -- effectively halting U.S. exports worth $97 million a year.
Other nations, like Japan, Korea and Russia, likewise stepped up tests for
the rice.

But even more troubles could lie ahead, trade analysts say, as increased
production of biotech products bring out the difference in countries'
approaches to regulating those goods.

"We have zero tolerance in the EU for this. It shouldn't be on the shelf,"
said Canice Nolan, who heads food safety for the European Commission's
delegation to the United States.

Suppan said skepticism about the safety of U.S. rice could easily seep into
consumers' beliefs about other crops.

The Bayer rice case is not the first time genetically modified food has made
its way into the world marketplace. In 2001, for example, a biotech corn
called StarLink, which was approved only for animals, was found in the food
chain.

"In the EU and others, there's a great deal of consumer resistance to GMO
foods ... We're not really looking very deeply at what the concerns of our
trading partners are," said Joe Mendelson, legal director for the Center for
Food Safety.

International standards a ways off

Some analysts say the U.S. process for approving biotech goods -- with USDA
overseeing environmental safety and the Food and Drug Administration looking
at human health considerations -- is fractured, calling it lax and unwieldy.

FDA hasn't formally evaluated LLRICE601. But the agency did rule out health
risks earlier this year, saying it's safe because it is so similar to other,
sanctioned GMO rice.

LLRICE601 is different from traditional rice because it contains a protein
called LibertyLink, which makes it resistant to a herbicide used to kill
weeds.

The United States might counter marketing problems by helping shape a new
international process for harmonizing food and crop safety rules, some crop
experts said, perhaps through the Rome-based food safety body Codex
Alimentarius.

Until that happens, "people have to grapple with this in a way as not to
disrupt trade," said Charlotte Hebebrand, president of the International
Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council.

According to Nolan, European officials will review the stepped-up testing
rules for U.S. rice in January.

If U.S. crops continue to be held up by concerns about contamination, other
countries could try to fill that gap. Thailand, the world's biggest rice
exporter, has said it hopes to increase sales to Europe. It does not permit
GMO crops.

Rachel Iadiciccio, a spokeswoman for USDA's Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, said that the agency was still investigating whether
Bayer had broken any rules by letting the GMO rice seep out into the food
supply.

Bayer, a division of Bayer AG (BAYG.DE: Quote, Profile, Research), is being
sued by a number of farmers seeking damages. Company spokesman Greg Coffey
said it is doing all it can to cooperate with USDA.

www.checkbiotech.org

------------------------------------------
Posted to Phorum via PhorumMail



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.