www.checkbiotech.org ; www.raupp.info ; www.czu.cz

Don Elsbernd is a savvy farmer who doesn't make hasty decisions about what
to plant on his 1,000 acres in northeast Iowa. But this year, the choice to
grow more corn and less soybeans seemed obvious. With corn prices soaring
toward $4 per bushel because of the booming ethanol industry, Elsbernd and
many other farmers are ready to cash in, March 2007.

'In my area, we're hearing about a lot of acres being switched,' said
Elsbernd, of Postville, who plans to grow corn on two-thirds of his land
rather than splitting it evenly with soybeans.

To produce enough corn for food, feed, and exports, and keep up with the
demand for renewable fuels, as many as 10 million additional corn acres
could be needed, according to industry estimates.

If that much additional corn were to be planted, it would be the highest
level since 1946, when American farmers helped feed postwar Europe.

The National Agricultural Statistics Service said hard numbers on what
farmers intend to plant won't be available until next month. But soybeans,
which were planted on almost the same acreage as corn last year, stand to
lose the most physical ground, especially in the Corn Belt.

Thanks to the likely drop in soybean production, prices for the legume have
almost mirrored the rise in corn prices.

'Soybeans is by far the number one crop that is going to lose acres, and you
can tell that because the price of soybeans is way up,' said Bruce Babcock,
director of the Center for Agricultural and Rural Development at Iowa State
University.

Rick Ostlie, president of the American Soybean Association, predicts up to 5
million acres of soybeans could be replaced with corn. He believes it will
be a short-term impact because 'a lot of the land we grow soybeans on would
not be suitable for corn.'Logistics will cause people to keep on planting
their soybeans,' said Ostlie, who grows about 2,000 acres of soybeans in
Northwood, N.D.

Corn prices have climbed as high as $4.08 per bushel recently. Last year at
the same time, they hovered around $2.22. Soybean prices also are climbing,
with March soybean futures priced at $7.59 compared to $5.87 a year ago, a
29 percent increase, Babcock said.

While corn costs more to produce because of higher seed, fertilizer,
equipment, transportation and storage costs, fluctuating estimates show that
corn can earn hundreds of dollars more per acre compared to soybeans, said
Corinne Alexander, an agricultural economics professor at Purdue University.
Much of the difference is because corn has a higher yield than soybeans --
an average of about 50 bushels per acre of soybeans compared to 150 bushels
per acre of corn, Alexander said.

Also affecting farmers' planting choices are record-ending stocks of
soybeans, about 595 million bushels this year, or about 20 percent of what
the nation uses each year, Alexander said. Ending stocks on corn are only at
752 million bushels, or 6.4 percent of usage.

'The last time we got down to this ratio ... corn futures went above $5,'
she said.

Ron Litterer, first vice president of the National Corn Growers Association,
said he thinks corn acres could increase by as much as 8 million acres this
year. Much of that will be a switch from soybeans to corn, but he said many
in the industry also expect new crop technology to increase corn yields at a
rate of about 2.5 percent per year.

The USDA says farmers were able to increase corn yields to an average 138
bushels per acre from 1996-2005, compared with 115 bushels during the
previous decade. Some seed companies predict corn to reach more than 200
bushels per acre within 10 years.

'Biotechnology is going to be a big plus in helping this happen,' said
Litterer, from Greene, Iowa. 'It's a very important part.' --

[www.hemscott.com]